The Left is riddled with hypocrisy. Their views are entirely subjective, based as they are on the context of the political ideologies of those involved. It is often the case that the subjective ‘truth’ that is the foundation of Leftist ideology conflicts with objective truth. When such conflicts occur, Leftist hypocrisy is readily exposed in their efforts to reconcile the two. If you consider any contemporary talking point in society, I guarantee that the Left will have inconsistent views. Let’s go through some of them..
Science:
Leftists disparage science. They say there are ‘other ways of knowing’. Yet when it came to Covid19 they insisted we follow the science.
Transgenderism:
Leftists insist that gender is a social construct. Yet when it comes to transgenderism they support the idea of binary genders where a woman has been born into a man’s body, or vice verse. In these situations Leftists demand that the binary is sacrosanct.
Defund the police:
Leftists spent the 2010s attacking Tories for austerity cuts, including the police. Yet as soon as the BLM protests happened they issued calls to ‘defund the police’
Sadiq Khan calls for more police funding and powers on community march with Rhyhiem Ainsworth Barton’s family
Racism:
Self-confessed ‘anti-racists’ are always from the hard left. Yet anti-racists are very comfortable in being racist to white people. But they justify white racism with the weak argument that you cannot be racist to white people, only brown people, thereby being racist to both to both white and brown people within the space of a single sentence.
Sexual Assault:
When Hollywood women were offered the opportunity to ‘do things’ to get that million dollar role, Leftist women created the ‘MeToo’ hashtag to highlight how oppressed they are. When thousands of working class British girls were exploited by Asian grooming gangs, Leftist women did not say a word. That’s hypocrisy.
This is how we learn of relative values on the totem pole of intersectionality: women are worth more than men, unless the men are brown. And middle class women are worth more than working class girls (because middle class women are very good at painting themselves as victims).
Homophobia and misogyny:
Leftists are always on high alert for any instances of homophobia and misogyny except….it rather depends on who – or which group – is being homophobic and misogynistic. If a white man commits either of these sins, Leftists will engage hyperactive hyperdrive in an effort to destroy the man’s life. However, Islamic homophobia and misogyny are never challenged. That’s not very consistent. What’s that word for when different races receive different treatments for the same offence based on their race? 🤔🤔🤔
Big State:
The Left state that government institutions are systemically racist. But the Left also say that the State should run everything.
Free speech:
The Left say they believe in free speech…except when people disagree with them and then they say there must be limits to free speech and that certain things are hate speech and need to be outlawed. Or, that certain statements constitute ‘microaggressions’. Such confused thinking is never going to lead to consistent policy.
Fascism:
The Left say that the Right is fascist yet it is the left that are:
Pulling down statues; Re-writing history; Attacking police; Pursuing censorship of the media; Pursuing censorship of the people by the (social) media; Trying to overturn democratic mandates (ie Brexit and Trump election); Trying to get transgressors fired (Cancel Culture).
Promotion of BAME people:
Leftists say the UK is systemically racist yet when Johnson appoints the most ethnically diverse cabinet in history, the Left attack these BAME politicians for being shills and uncle toms.
Terrorism:
When a white man goes on a murder spree, the Leftist media – particularly the US media is quick to highlight his race and to exaggerate the frequency of white terrorism. They conclude that white terrorism is out of control and steps need to be taken to abolish whiteness. Whiteness is the problem and we are all equally guilty!
However….if the suspect is ethnic, the editorial line is very different! Then, the ethnicity is downplayed by the media. If the ethnicity cannot be avoided – typically because he screamed ‘alla’s snack bar’ just prior to detonating his dirty bomb then the media solemnly intones that we mustn’t paint all [insert minority group here] with the same brush just because of one bad apple. Then everyone sings ‘Don’t Look Back In Anger’ and we all carry on as though nothing had happened.
Look how Amy Siskind’s tone changed once she found out the Boulder shooter was non-white…
Atticus Fox 