If you genuinely believe that humans are responsible for destroying the planet via Climate Change then Game Theory would propose that the only rational solution would be to drastically reduce the human population. Such an outcome is what AI would determine.
Unsurprisingly, many Global Stakeholders who push the Climate Change and Environmentalist narratives have expressed their Malthusian desires to reduce the human population
Eugenics has been a popular philosophy of the upper classes since at least the Victorian era before becoming an unacceptable topic after WW2. However, as the quotes below prove, the idea of eugenics remains central to the ideology of what are now called the ‘Global Stakeholders’.
https://expose-news.com/2025/01/08/47-quotes-from-self-styled-elites/
John D Rockefeller:
‘The population problem must be recognised by government as a principal element in long-range planning.’
Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood):
‘All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class.’ And… ‘The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.’
Ted Turner:
‘A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.’
Boris Johnson (Baby-maker extraordinaire):
‘The primary challenge facing our species is the reproduction of our species itself … It is time we had a grown-up discussion about the optimum quantity of human beings in this country and on this planet’
Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder:
‘My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with its full complement of species, returning throughout the world.’
Paul Ehrlich, member of ‘Club of Rome’, a former science adviser to President George W. Bush and the author of ‘The Population Bomb’:
‘Solving the population problem is not going to solve the problems of racism … of sexism … of religious intolerance … of war … of gross economic inequality. But if you don’t solve the population problem, you’re not going to solve any of those problems. Whatever problem you’re interested in, you’re not going to solve it unless you also solve the population problem.’
Maurice Strong (First executive director of the UN Environment Programme; Foundation director of WEF; member of World Business Council for Sustainable Development):
‘Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?’
Professor Philip Cafaro (Colorado State University) in a paper entitled ‘Climate Ethics and Population Policy’:
‘Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.’
Jacques Costeau:
‘In order to stabilise world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.’
Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola:
‘If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die.’
Prince Philip (Co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund):
‘In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.’
Bill Gates (doctor and farmer): ‘The problem is that the population is growing the fastest where people are less able to deal with it. So it’s in the very poorest places that you’re going to have a tripling in population by 2050. (…) And we’ve got to make sure that we help out with the tools now so that they don’t have an impossible situation later’
And let’s not forget Guide #1 on the Georgia Guidestones, organised under conditions of high secrecy but since destroyed, which stated ‘maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.’
Eugenics and population control has been a constant pre-occupation of the intelligentsia since the Victorian era.
When humanity is a variable and the environment is a constraint, the optimization function can solve for fewer humans.
Atticus Fox 