Emmanuel Abayisenga – Read It And Weep

I saw a brief story on Telegram recently about a failed asylum seeker – Emmanuel Abayisenga – in France who had set fire to a cathedral out of frustration at having his asylum claim rejected. He was then offered accommodation by a local priest who, a short while later, he murdered.

This story seemed too fantastical to be true. I thought some important context must have been omitted from this ‘click-bait’ synopsis on Telegram. Plus, I hadn’t read about this story anywhere else even though I would have expected wide coverage for so shocking a story. Nationalist media often like to contrast the naivety of white liberals with the brutality of illegal immigrants.  This story seemed to be the most extreme example of that contrast that I had encountered. It couldn’t be true. So I decided to investigate  myself, just to learn the truth.

What did I discover? That the story was true in every detail. Here are some further details:

The Prof. Maurice website records the following:

‘The Vendée Assize Court sentenced Emmanuel Abayisenga on Thursday, January 22, 2026, to 30 years of criminal imprisonment for the murder of Father Olivier Maire, which occurred in August 2021. The defendant had previously been convicted for the arson attack on Nantes Cathedral in 2020.’

‘As provincial superior of the Montfort Missionaries, Father Olivier Maire, aged 60, had welcomed Emmanuel Abayisenga into his religious community after his release under judicial supervision. The priest was known for his pastoral commitment and his faithfulness to Christian values of charity and forgiveness.’

‘The events took place during the night of August 8–9, 2021, in Saint-Laurent-sur-Sèvre. According to the autopsy, the priest died as a result of violent blows to the head. The day after the crime, the accused voluntarily reported himself to the gendarmerie.’

‘Father Olivier Maire’s body was found covered in blood in the building where both men were staying. The case caused strong public emotion in France, particularly within the Catholic Church.’

‘Already sentenced in 2023 to four years in prison for the arson of Nantes Cathedral—an attack that notably destroyed the cathedral’s grand organ—Emmanuel Abayisenga had been accommodated by the religious community upon his release from detention.’

Here are details from ‘Le Monde’, a more credible news source, including the detail that Abayisenga was 45 years old at the start of the murder trial in Jan 2026 and a Rwandan national:

‘At the request of a nun, he [Father Olivier Maire] had been hosting Abayisenga for two months. Abayisenga had just been released from preventive detention for setting fire to Nantes Cathedral‘.

Most of Le Monde’s article is paywalled but a brief biography of Father Maire is available.

‘Maire was 61 years old. Ordained at the age of 30 into the international Catholic congregation of the Montfort Missionaries, he had studied ancient languages, the history of religions and earned a theology degree from the Centre Sèvres in Paris. He spent much of his life in Uganda working with imprisoned children, then in Haiti, where he lived through the January 2010 earthquake, and in Rome. He was eventually appointed provincial superior of the congregation in France, overseeing international relations and the ties with the Vatican.’

NCR Online has further details:

‘Emmanuel Abayisenga, 40, a Catholic, had been released on bail earlier this year for the 2020 arson at Sts. Peter and Paul Cathedral in Nantes. Montfort Fr. Olivier Maire, 60, had offered him housing in Saint-Laurent-sur-Sèvre, south of Nantes.’

‘On July 25, 2020, Abayisenga admitted lighting two fires in the area of a 17th-century organ and a third above an electrical panel in the Cathedral of Sts. Peter and Paul a week earlier. He had been volunteering at the cathedral as a warden and had the keys to the building because he was responsible for locking it up on the day of the fire. He had been in the country since 2012.’

Wikipedia has the following entry about the fire at Nantes Cathedral:

‘Around 100 firefighters tackled the blaze. Police investigated the incident as a possible act of arson…After the fire, a 39-year-old church volunteer, Emmanuel Abayisenga, a Rwandan illegal immigrant who had lived in France since 2012, was detained for questioning but released without charge. However, he was later re-arrested and confessed to setting the fire; he was charged with arson.’

Ouest France adds this detail:

‘He was one of the seven guardians of the keys to the cathedral. Emmanuel Abayisenga, 39, was responsible for closing the doors the day before the fire…He was being housed by the priest at the time of the murder, and for several months previously.’

The BBC has a story about Abayisenga being released without charge in relation to the arson attack but there are no stories about either of his convictions. Typical.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53462790

France24:

‘A French court on Wednesday handed a four-year jail term to an arsonist for starting a fire that severely damaged a Gothic cathedral in the city of Nantes in 2020…The court ruled that Abayisenga was not mentally sound at the time of the fire at the Cathedral of Saint Peter and Saint Paul when it handed down the sentence.’

Also:

‘Abayisenga has a history of unsuccessful asylum claims and received an order to leave France in 2019, which was said to have deeply troubled him…Prosecutor Veronique Wester-Ouisse said the defendant set fire to the cathedral knowingly due to “huge anger and a feeling of revenge linked to his administrative situation”.’

‘The cathedral’s owners estimated the damage at more than 40 million euros ($43 million).’

So the timeline is as follows:

2012 – Abayisenga arrives in France from Rwanda.

2019 – Abayisenga receives an order to leave France.

18 July 2020 – Abayisenga sets 3 fires in Nantes Cathedral.

25 July 2020 – Abayisenga admits to setting fire to Nantes Cathedral

2021 – Abayisenga released into care of Father Maire.

8 August 2021 – Abayisenga murders Father Maire.

March 2023 – Sentenced to 4 years for arson attacks on Nantes Cathedral.

Jan 2026 – Sentenced to 30 years for murder of Father Maire.

This is another example of what can happen when high trust people come into proximity with low trust people. I have written before about high trust vs low trust, by comparison with the Eloi and Morlocks in Wells’ ‘The Time Machine’

Furthermore, it’s incredible how many Africans receive reduced sentences in Europe due to ‘mental health’ or ‘psychiatric issues’ or being not ‘mentally sound’. This whole story is sickening.

UK Corruption: A Dossier

Over the last 10 years, the UK has fallen from 11th to 20th in Transparency International’s ‘Corruption Perception Index’ (CPI) with the UK’s CPI score falling from 81 in 2015 to 70 in 2025.

https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2025

The CPI ranks 182 countries and territories worldwide by their perceived levels of public sector corruption. The results are given on a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).

Transparency International defines corruption as:

‘the abuse of entrusted power for private gain.’

I’m not surprised that the UK is sliding down this index. I’m sure most Brits can sense the rising tide of corruption all around us, even if we might be hard pressed to name many specific examples.

So, to fuel your righteous anger with the grifters that run Britain, I have compiled this dossier of corruption cases that have emerged in Britain over the last few years:

1. PPE procurement (“VIP lane”) (2020–2021)

Key figures: Matt Hancock, Michelle Mone and others

What happened: During COVID,  a special fast-track system – called the “VIP lane” – was created for suppliers recommended by:
MPs
Ministers
Officials

One example is as follows: On 12 May 2020, a company called ‘PPE Medpro’ was incorporated in the Isle of Man through Doug Barrowman’s Knox Group. The next day, a UK entity with the same name was incorporated in Britain. The company had no history, no track record, and no employees to speak of. Baroness Mone, a Conservative peer and member of the House of Lords, referred PPE Medpro to Michael Gove’s office without declaring any financial interest. She was logged as the “source of referral” for the government’s fast-track VIP procurement route. On 12 June 2020, thirty-one days after the company was incorporated, the Department of Health awarded it a contract for £81 million and 210 million face masks. On 26 June, a second contract followed for £122 million and 25 million sterile surgical gowns. The gowns were not sterile. They were invalidly labelled, single-wrapped when regulations require double-wrapping, and supplied without sterilisation certification. They were never used on a patient. Of the £203 million the company received, Barrowman collected more than £65 million. Barrowman and Mone are husband and wife. Neither Mone nor Barrowman has been convicted of any criminal offence. She remains in the House of Lords.


Companies in this lane were  approximately 10× more likely to win contracts than normal applicants.
Issue:
Cronyism:
Firms with political connections (including donors) were prioritised with no checks on suitability or credibility of the companies involved.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_regarding_COVID-19_contracts_in_the_United_Kingdom

Lack of expertise: More than half of contracts were awarded to firms with no relevant experience.

Lack of competition:
Many contracts were awarded without open bidding.

Outcome: ~£15+ billion spent on PPE overall, of which, at least £7–10 billion estimated lost to waste, fraud, or unusable equipment.

Multiple court rulings found the process unlawful due to lack of transparency.

No-one lost their job and no-one went to prison.

https://www.spotlightcorruption.org/half-of-vip-lane-companies-supplied-ppe-worth-1-billion-that-was-not-fit-for-purpose/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.ukanticorruptioncoalition.org/work/release-a-missed-opportunity-notorious-vip-lane-unaddressed-in-landmark-report-on-covid-fraud

2. Mandelson–Epstein payments controversy (2003–2010)

Key figures: Peter Mandelson, Jeffrey Epstein, Reinaldo Avila da Silva

What happened:

2003–2004: Newly released Epstein financial records show three payments of $25,000 (total $75,000) linked to Mandelson, with references to him as beneficiary and at least one payment to an account in his name or associated with him.
2009–2010: Separate, documented emails show Epstein sent around £10,000 (and possibly more) to Mandelson’s partner, Reinaldo Avila da Silva, to fund an osteopathy course. These payments were described as a “loan.”

https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2026/04/26/starmer-breaking-ministerial-code/

Issue: Unexplained financial payments from a wealthy, Mossad-linked paedofile, sex-trafficker and suspected blackmailer to a senior UK politician. Furthermore, Mandelson rents a four-bedroom farmhouse in the Pewsey Vale (Wilts.) multi-millionaire financier Nathaniel Rothschild. Epstein is on record saying he ‘works for the Rothchilds’. Does Mandelson also work for the Rothchilds?
There are huge conflict of interest concerns here, especially given Mandelson held senior government roles. What was Mandelson providing in return for these payments?  Outcome: Mandelson has said he has no recollection of the earlier $75,000 payments.
No criminal charges or formal findings of corruption have been made in relation to these payments. Mandelson did have the good grace to step down from the House Of Lords.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/home-news/epstein-mandelson-husband-money-b2911753.html

3. Palantir ‘Non-meeting’

Key Figures: Keir Starmer & Peter Mandelson, 2025

What happened: In Feb 2025, while on a trip to US, Keir Starmer and Peter Mandelson visited Palantir’s HQ – while Palantir was a paying client of Mandelson’s lobbying firm – and somehow “forgot” to log it as a ministerial meeting.
Issue: The Ministry of Defence, whose officials were also there, called it a meeting, Palantir called it a standard government visit, but Downing Street insisted it wasn’t a meeting at all.

Outcome:  This ‘meeting’ was just enough of a “non-meeting” for the PM, his ambassador and a spy-tech contractor to sit in a room together with no minutes and no transparency leading, a  few months later, to the announcement of a £240m no-tender contract.

4. Greensill Capital / Lobbying scandal (2021)
Key figure: David Cameron

What happened: Cameron had lobbied Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak in 2020 to change the rules in order to allow Greensill, a company Cameron worked for, to join the Covid Corporate Financing Facility, a government loan scheme.
Issue: Access and influence — he used personal connections (texts, calls) to push for government-backed loans.
Outcome: In 2023 Sunak was rewarded with the role of Foreign Secretary and given a life peerage.

https://www.thecanary.co/uk/news/2021/06/28/auditors-for-greensill-capital-and-sanjeev-gupta-linked-bank-face-investigation/

5. Richard Desmond / planning decision (2020)
Key figures: Richard Desmond and Robert Jenrick
What happened: Jenrick overruled his own planning inspector and local council objections to fast-track Desmond’s project, unlawfully approving a £1bn housing development on the Isle of Dogs in January 2020, just one day before new council levies would have cost developer Richard Desmond approximately £40m–£50m. Jenrick made this decision shortly after Desmond sat next to him at a Conservative Party fundraising dinner and before Desmond donated £12,000 to the party two weeks later.
Issue: A businessman pulls in a favour from a senior politician to override the system for financial gain.
Outcome: Decision ruled unlawful by a court due to apparent bias.

https://news.sky.com/story/the-1bn-development-and-the-tory-donor-the-robert-jenrick-controversy-explained-12014447

6. Jimmy Savile Case Files

Key Figures: Keir Starmer

What happened: All CPS files on Savile were destroyed in October 2010, a year before Savile died. This was due to the decision to take no action against Savile resulting in the Service’s files being “automatically deleted,” according to the CPS’ “normal policy.” However, Service guidelines on “retention and disposal” of evidence clearly state that documents on “discontinued cases,” in which “no proceedings have taken place or where the case was discontinued before trial,” must be kept for five years. The destruction of the Savile file was a flagrant breach of these rules

Issue: The decision to violate the guidelines on such a high profile case had to have been made at the highest levels of the CPS. We are thus left to ponder whether Starmer himself made that call, and if so, why. The implication is that the evidence was destroyed so that the names of those who had knowledge of Savile’s crimes during his lifetime – and covered for them – would not be revealed.

Outcome: Savile lived out his days as a free man. Starmer moved onwards and upwards as reliable men do.

https://thegrayzone.com/2024/07/06/keir-starmer-scrutiny-protected-savile/

7. Owen Paterson lobbying case (2021)
Key figure: Owen Paterson
What happened: Paid to lobby ministers on behalf of companies.
Issue: Breach of lobbying rules (paid advocacy).
Outcome: Found to have committed an “egregious” breach; resigned as MP. Government attempt to change rules mid-case caused backlash.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/what-did-owen-paterson-do-b1952077.html


8. Richard Sharp’s ascent to   Director-General of the BBC

Key figures: Richard Sharp; Boris Johnson

What happened: Richard Sharp helped Boris obtain a personal loan while Boris was PM and in need of funds. Six months later Sharp was awarded the role of Director-General of the BBC, having been supported for the role by Johnson

Issue: People are awarded plum jobs based not on merit but cronyism.

Outcome: Sharp was forced to resign when the truth emerged.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/apr/28/richard-sharp-resigns-as-bbc-chair-after-months-of-mounting-pressure

9. “Cash for access” / second jobs issues (ongoing)
Key figures: Multiple MPs across parties
What happened: MPs paid as consultants or advisors while holding office.
Issue: Potential conflicts of interest and influence-buying.
Outcome: Legal within rules (with disclosure), but widely criticised as a systemic weakness.

10. The Public / Private Revolving Door

Key figures: Beth West; Catherine Ross; Anne Baldock and many others.
What happened: Beth West was HS2’s commercial director from 2012 to 2017, overseeing the procurement framework that determined which contractors received billions in public money. After leaving, she joined Balfour Beatty, one of the contractors that had won under her framework, as Managing Director of its southern construction division. Eight weeks after she arrived, the contract value approximately doubled to £5 billion. Later, she became chief executive of East West Railway Company, another Department for Transport-sponsored body with authority over billions in future rail procurement. No regulator reviewed any of these moves. She has never been named in Parliament.

Cathryn Ross was chief executive of Ofwat, the regulator that sets water company prices and oversees their financial performance. Under its watch, companies paid out billions in dividends while sewage infrastructure went unimproved, and between 2019 and 2023 discharged 12.7 million monitored hours of untreated sewage into English waterways. Ross left in 2018 and joined Thames Water, the company she had been regulating, eventually becoming its interim co-chief executive. At least 27 former Ofwat directors, managers, and consultants have been identified working in the water industry they helped regulate.

Anne Baldock serves as a non-executive director of Kier Group, which earns over ninety per cent of its revenue from public sector clients and holds around £2.4 billion in HS2 receipts, while simultaneously serving as Senior Independent Director of East West Railway Company, a Department for Transport arm’s-length body delivering publicly funded rail infrastructure.
Issue: Potential conflicts of interest and influence-buying. These individuals do not rotate between the two sides. They occupy both simultaneously, and there is no register of those overlaps, no conflict-of-interest requirement that would prevent them, and no mechanism by which Parliament can see how many such arrangements exist.
Outcome: Nothing, of course.

Do you see the pattern here: no-one is held accountable, no-one goes to court. No-one pays back monies they received. Not only does the corruption happen, but the perpetrators get away with it, even when the corruption comes to light. I can’t see a way out of the corruption tailspin the UK has entered. Corruption is coming from the top which signals to everyone else that its becoming an acceptable way of receiving donations or investments or government contracts or well-renumerated sinecures in the private sector.

The Economic Bonanza Will Kick In Any Minute Now

The British people have been told for over 30 years that we need mass immigration because we have an aging population. You can’t have more old people than young people, you see, because the pension system will collapse and GDP will collapse and everything will collapse.

So here we are in 2026, having admitted 5.6 million immigrants since 1997.  The foreign born population in England and Wales has reached 11.3 million.

https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-the-conservatives-and-labours-records-on-legal-migration

In 1997, the state pension age was 60 for women and 65 for men. Since then it has increased incrementally to the point that, for young people, it is now 68 irrespective of gender.

We are told that the state pension age must rise or the pension system will collapse. But what about the young, healthy migrants whose work was supposed to fund the pension system?

It seems immigration hasn’t solved the pension crisis at all. In fact, if there is a correlation between immigration and pensions, the correlation would appear to be that the more immigration rises, the worse the pension system becomes and, therefore, we all need to work for longer.

Now, there are stories planted in the press, that the state pension age may need to rise to 75.

People like Zoe Gardner would contend that the problem is we haven’t imported enough immigrants. Zoe argues that the govt has deliberately not imported enough immigrants so that they can work us Brits to death.

How many migrants is enough? Do we need another 10 million? 20 million? And what happens when the immigrants retire, do we need to feed the Ponzi scheme by bringing in another 50 million?

We need to realise that importing millions of migrants will not lead to an economic bonanza. Meanwhile, house prices are extortionate due to lack of supply and the birth rate is collapsing due to marriage and children appearing unachievable at current house prices. Plus, young Brits are competing with migrants for resources. It’s painful out there.

So, maybe there’s an alternative approach. Let’s find out what happens to a society with an ageing population. Lets not try to ‘fix’ it by bringing in millions of Asians. Let the demographics play out. Yes, the pension system will be expensive but considering what else the government throws money at these days, the expense can be justified because, after a short period of time, the pensioners will start dying off. As they die, their houses will come on the market. A glut of houses for sale. This glut, will exert a downward pressure on house prices. With house prices cheaper, we may witness a rise in birth rates as couples no longer view children as an unaffordable luxury.

So a falling population will self-correct. People will have more children which will offset the death rate.  The circumstances leading to falling birth rate will disappear naturally.

I have never understood this concept that the population must always keep rising or else everything will go wrong. I think that is the biased perspectives of politicians and corporations who just want to see rising figures on their spreadsheets. Plus, we are told that AI is going to take everyone’s jobs, so we won’t need as many people.

The immigration Ponzi scheme is unsustainable. Not only that but it doesn’t work in its intended objective of improving standards of living. Working harder for longer and admitting millions of migrants are regressive steps.

The Managerial Classes Are The Sails that are Taking Us Onto The Rocks

Power in Britain operates through strata. At the top sits the Globalists: the movers and shakers who seek Global Governance and who set the national and international policies that will bring such governance into being. They also invent the ‘Global problems’  that can be leveraged to drive Global solutions, that further the drive towards Global Governance. For the most part they work in the shadows as the ‘invisible hand’.

Beneath them sits the governing class: ministers, senior civil servants, regulators, media executives, and institutional managers whose principal skill is not vision but adjustment. They do not design policy, they introduce the policies they are asked to introduce.

Below these sit the client groups: NGOs, academic departments, consultancies, subsidised corporations, and professional bodies that generate moral narratives on demand. They justify policy after the fact. They provide cover and personnel.

And below them are the managerial classes. These are the people who have white collar jobs at multinational organisations or they are administrators within the educational or health industries. Or they are professionals such as doctors, lawyers, architects, etc.. Or they are people whose salaries are dependent upon government grants.

These people are the problem. These people are the focus of this essay.

Not because they create Globalist policies, not because they enforce Globalist policies but because they are more than happy to legitimise such policies by adopting them.

The managerial class are those people who spend their time checking the direction of the political winds and ensuring they are in alignment with those winds.

Why? Well, consensus and compliance are key to these people. If they are seen to fit in then they will be promoted. They want to say the right thing at dinner parties so they fit in.  If they ever had an alternative view to the managerial class consensus, they suppress it. If a superior tells them to do something, they do it. If a superior tells them to believe something, they believe it.

They parrot the mantras that are expected from them….Brexit is Bad; a transwoman is a woman; more needs to done about climate change; diversity is our strength; black lives matter; war is peace.. 

These are the people that would have pushed the buttons in Milgram’s Experiments. These are the people whose defence would be ‘I was just following orders’.

The Managerial Class do what they’re told.

The Managerial Class realise that compliance and conformity are the keys to their success. However, being seen to be open to new ideas such as ‘Transwomen are women’ also shows them to be open-minded. There is also a huge class component to their actions:  the vast majority of the managerial class are middle class or aspiring to be middle class. As such, they are always looking for ways to differentiate themselves from the working classes. Adopting new ideas that are filtered down from The Establishment works on many levels: they can show how open-minded they are whilst also differentiating themselves from the working class and showing their bosses how compliant they are. In this way the Managerial Class can disguise snobbery as virtue.

This is similar to the ‘Luxury Beliefs’ idea where certain well-to-do people pretend to support certain extreme Leftist beliefs – such as mass immigration – not only to virtue-signal their cultural sophistication – but also to indicate that they operate above the sordid chase for affordable resources that pre-occupies the working classes. Luxury Beliefs are adopted by the Upper Middle Classes because they can afford them. Luxury Beliefs are adopted by the Managerial Class because they want to ape the behaviours of the Upple Middle Classes.

The Managerial Class went to University – not necessarily the best universities – so now they want to show how educated and open-minded they are by adopting the same sophisticated views that they have have come into contact with from their lecturers or News Presenters or left wing politicians or prominent women or celebrities or celebrated journalists. Or the HR department at work.

It’s also about progressing in their careers. The Managerial Class have the potential to earn huge amounts of money and they are only too aware that if they want to earn the Big Money they need to show they are the right sort of people. Therefore, even if they don’t believe in the latest idiocy they are being asked to swallow, they have to pretend that they do. In being guided by opportunity rather than principle they become Useful Idiots in the machinations of the Globalists.

I thought that Leftists were the only large category of pro-Establishmentists – look how quickly they all fell into line once it was declared that ‘Transwomen are women’. However, the Managerial Class are another large category of sheep, albeit harder to detect, because for the most part the Managerial Class are less strident in their support. They simply swing into the correct lane whenever a new ‘current thing’ appears. Ukraine? George Floyd? Covid19? mRNA jabs? We all know which position the Managerial Class will adopt.

We know from LinkedIn that the Managerial Class are very careful not to express any thought that might cause any offence to anyone who employs them or might be likely to employ them in the future. Thus, the LinkedIn crowd who expressed an opinion on Brexit were solidly in favour of Remaining in the EU as that was the only acceptable position in polite circles. To have done otherwise would have raised questions and eyebrows. And the LI crowd don’t criticise the govt because that might backfire on them. The Managerial Class are very careful to espouse the right opinions but not to espouse them too vehemently as the ‘right opinions’ might change in the future and they don’t want to be strongly associated with an opinion that is no longer fashionable.

There is a sizeable majority of the Managerial Class that realise there are opportunities that come with supporting whichever political position the Globalists endorse.

Promotions (there are many management layers available to the Managerial Class, plus grants, plus roles with NGOs & Think Tanks, not to mention to wealth that can be gleaned from the public purse that will accrue to those who mouth what the Globalists would have them mouth.

Also, the Managerial Class see themselves as ‘experts’ – because they have degrees, you see –  so they are very referential to other experts. As such, they lose all critical faculties as soon as someone appeals to the higher authority of ‘experts’. The Managerial Class don’t have time to research those subjects the Globalists are using to enslave us (Climate Change; gender theory; critical race theory; stakeholder capitalism; digital IDs; CBDCs; Agenda 2030; ; mRNA therapies; Smart cities; Net Zero, The EU, etc etc etc). If a group of experts say that temperatures are rising and it’s all definitely man’s fault, then that’s good enough for the Managerial Class (particularly when all their peers at work and at dinner parties recite the same mantra). If the BBC news says something is so, then it must be so.

You see the Managerial Class know that they operate in a rarified atmosphere where they are paid more than they are worth and, if they can get on the right side of the right people, they can earn much, much more than they’re worth.

By contrast, the working classes don’t have this option which keeps them true to themselves. If you are working in a factory, there are no opportunities for advancement just because you espouse that Net Zero is a great idea.

Because they can be so easily bought with trinkets of promotions etc the Managerial Class lend legitimacy to the Globalists plans.

The Managerial Class dutifully buy the EVs and the heat pumps and put solar panels on their roofs because they want to show that they are the right sort of people. They know that Patriotism must be suppressed at every opportunity. They can be easily convinced to follow economically destructive policies by being told ‘it’s for the Greater Good’.

They support the EU because they know that is what sophisticated people do.

They instal Smart meters in their houses because of the ‘convenience’ and they’ll rush to apply for Digital IDs for the same reason. They know they will gain extra cache if they can be first to adopt these tools of enslavement.

In short, the Managerial Class dutifully promote the globalist agenda which allows the Globalist Agenda to advance.

And that is why the Managerial Class are the idiots taking us onto the rocks. They do not partake in critical thinking. They question nothing. They shut their mouths and get on with it.

The rich no longer run the structures of the nation: they don’t run the large companies, nor the governments, nor the NGOs. They have people that do this for them. As such, the Managerial Class effectively run the world. Yet the managerial class are just bureaucrats, they don’t have their own money invested, so they don’t have the same mindset as an owner-manager would be. They follow the signals they absorb from the media and take the risk-free pathways safe in the knowledge that they will always have the excuse that they supported all the right causes and thought all the right things.

‘The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.’
– George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman

Postscript: This article by Keith Woods shows the effect the Managerial Class are having on Ireland

https://chroniclesmagazine.org/correspondence/why-ireland-is-so-left-wing/

The Establishment Tried 2 False Flags. They Didn’t Work

Two points of note in the recent news cycle.

1) The ballistic missiles that were fired at Diego Garcia on 20th March
– Corporate media was quick to apportion blame to Iran yet just as quickly the story was memory-holed without further mention. Why has this story been dropped so quickly? Bear that thought in mind as we delve into a somewhat related story… 

2) The arson attack on Jewish ambulances in London
– The media was febrile with talk of terrorism and antisemitism with probable links to Iran.
On March 23, a shadowy Iran-linked organization called ‘Ashab al Yamin’ claimed responsibility for setting a vehicle ablaze in Antwerp’s Jewish Quarter. The day before, the group said it was behind an arson attack on four ambulances owned by a Jewish non-profit in London. The incidents add to the growing number of claims of attacks by Ashab al Yamin against Jewish and Western targets in Europe

The incidents in Antwerp and London raise the total number of attacks claimed by Ashab al Yamin to seven since it first emerged, fully formed, in early March. None of the incidents resulted in injury.

However, as Lowkey points out on X:
‘It is worthy of note that the group which is claiming responsibility for the burning of ambulances last night refers to Palestine as “the land of Israel.”
It does so in both English and Arabic, which is particularly unusual.’ Unusual for an Iranian terror group not to include  the Iranian language of Farsi.


Craig Murray makes further illuminating observations:

‘The first online “evidence” of the existence of the group was on 9 March. On 16 March the entire Israeli Hasbara machinery, in coordination, went into overdrive on Harakat Ashab al-Yamin. Israel’s Diaspora Ministry issued a statement. So did Israel’s MFA. So did the Institute of National Security Studies. So did BICOM – the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre. All on the same morning. At a time when Harakat Ashab al-Yamin had done nothing except allegedly start a small fire in Rotterdam…No Islamic group, ever, referred to “The Land of Israel” and the phrase in Arabic is not even what complicit Gulf Arab elites use – they use just “Israel” or “The State of Israel”. “The Land of Israel” is unnatural in Arabic and evidently written by a Zionist and translated into Arabic

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2026/03/the-london-ambulances-attack-of-course-it-was-a-false-flag/

As a result of these red flags, many in the independent media have suggested, vigorously, that the attacks by a new Iranian terrorist cell are false flags, which possibly explains why this story has also been memory-holed by the corporate media.

Now reconsider the memory-holing of the Diego Garcia missiles.


It is always interesting to see stories burst across the front pages before slinking away in shame just a day or two later. Neither story achieved the required momentum so they were dispatched as not only no longer useful but as potentially harmful if too many ‘normies’ became aware of the flaws in the official narrative.

Quotes That Reveal We Where Are, Right Now

Collecting quotes is a recent thing for me. It started about 6 years ago when I started paying a lot more attention to politics. People like to draw attention to a situation by using words that have been used before. And why not? If a situation has been described perfectly once before, use it. No point reinventing the wheel. I started collecting the best quotes I encountered. Here are 57 of them with some –  occasional – added context from me. They are mostly in the order that I encountered them. However, I have grouped quotes by author and, in a couple of instances, by sub-theme. The main theme that unites these quotes is that Governments accrue too much power and that only a minority of people appreciate the dangers of powerful governments:

1) ‘Emergencies’ have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded.’
— Friedrich Hayek

2) ‘The skillful propagandist has power to mold their minds in any direction he chooses, and even the most intelligent and independent people cannot entirely escape that influence if they are long isolated from all other sources of information.’ — Friedrich Hayek, The Road to Serfdom

3) ‘In Britain, everything is policed except crime.’ – Mark Steyn

A couple from Mencken:

4) ‘The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out… without regard to the prevailing
superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest,
insane, intolerable.’ – H. L. Mencken


5) ‘The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.’ -H. L. Mencken

6) ‘There are two types of people in the world: people who think the government is looking out for their best interests and people who think.’ – Nathan Fraser


7) ‘My political opinions lean more and more to Anarchy (philosophically understood, meaning abolition of control not whiskered men with bombs). The most improper job of any man is bossing other men. Not one in a million is fit for it, and least of all those who seek the opportunity.’
J.R.R.Tolkien The Letters of J. R R. Tolkien

Atticus: Hard to disagree with Tolkien’s sentiments

8) ‘To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas.’
Bsock Chishelm, 1st director-general of the World Health Organization.

9) ‘Feminists want the power of men, the privileges of women and the responsibilities of neither.’ – source unknown

Some quotes on ‘tolerance’:

10) ‘Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.’ – Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

11) ‘When tolerance mainly serves the protection and preservation of a repressive society, when it serves to neutralize opposition and to render men immune against other and better forms of life, then tolerance has been perverted. … Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left.’
Herbert Marcuse, Repressive Tolerance

Atticus: isn’t this what we are seeing. There is no such thing as ‘Far Left’ whilst we witness ‘Far Right’ levelled at anyone who wonders whether the government’s immigration policies are correct.

12) ‘Tolerance is the virtue of people who do not believe in anything.’
G. K. Chesterton

13) ‘I have seen great intolerance shown in support of tolerance.’
Samuel Taylor Coleridge

14) ‘It is not the evil itself which is horrifying about our times – it is the way we not only tolerate evil, but have made a cult of positively worshiping weakness, depravity, rottenness and evil itself.’ – George Lincoln Rockwell

15) ‘Every high civilization decays by forgetting obvious things.’
G.K. Chesterton

Atticus: Having studied Spengler, I do not think civilisations ‘forget’, I think that  they become embarrassed by policies that were the source of their success and seek to distance themselves from such policies. An example in the contemporary West would be ‘ethnic homogeneity’ which is now viewed as unacceptable yet drove the success of Western culture.

16) ‘The state did not own men so entirely, even when it could send them to the stake , as it sometimes does now where it can send them to the elementary school.’ -G. K. Chesterton

Atticus: Chesterton is great. Here’s another one:

‘A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend
what is good.’
– G. K. Chesterton

Here is a set from Schopenauer who, for a long time, I was only aware of due to a reference to him in Monty Python’s ‘Meaning Of Life’:

17) ‘What the herd hates most is the one who thinks differently; it is not so much the opinion itself, but the audacity of wanting to think for themselves, something that they do not know how to do.’ – Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

18) ‘All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.’ – Arthur Schopenhauer

19) ‘Because women in truth exist entirely for the propagation of the race, and their destiny ends here, they live more for the species than for the individual, and in their hearts take the affairs of the species more seriously than those of the individual’. – Arthur Schopenhauer


20) ‘Power is in tearing
human minds to pieces
and putting them together
again in new shapes of
your own choosing.’ – George Orwell, 1984

Here is a set on ‘Propaganda’:

21) ‘The point of modern propaganda isn’t only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking to annihilate the truth.’ – Gary Kasparov

22) ‘The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power of our country.’ —Edward Bernays, Propaganda (1928)

23) ‘Most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.’
– Michael Rivero


24) ‘A fact is information minus emotion. An opinion is information plus experience. Ignorance is an opinion lacking information, And, stupidity is an opinion that ignores a fact.’
Carl Sagan


25) ‘At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child – miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats’. -P.J. O’Rourke

26) ‘Feminism liberated women from the natural dignity of their sex and turned them into inferior men.’
– Francis Parker Yockey, Imperium: Philosophy of History & Politics


27) ‘Fraud and falsehood dread examination. Truth invites it.’
– Samuel Johnson


28) ‘We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be
free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert.’
-J Robert Oppenheimer


29) ‘All things are subject to
interpretation whichever
interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.’
– Friedrich Nietzsche


30) ‘The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the Iaws.’ – Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome

31) ‘It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.’
– Upton Sinclair

32) ‘Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses.’ – Plato

33) ‘Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves.’
– Henry David Thoreau


I think I found this next  quote in a ‘below the line’ comment section, online, and thought it worth keeping. I do not have a link to the article that prompted it:

34) ‘Pathetic, empty and unproductive people don’t care about losing their freedom, because they weren’t doing anything meaningful with it anyways. Many of these same people rejoice at the loss of freedom for others because it makes them feel better about their miserable existence.’ – Murray @Rothbard1776

Here is a brace from Solzhenitsyn:


35) ‘Human beings are born with different capacities. If they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.’ – Alexander Solzhenitsyn


36) ‘A Marxist system is recognized by the fact that it spares the criminals and criminalizes political opponents.’ – Alexander
Solzhenitsyn

And a brace from Spengler:

37) ‘What is truth? For the multitude, that which it continually reads and hears.’ – Oswald Spengler

38) ‘Formerly no one was allowed to think freely; now it is permitted, but no one is capable of it any more. Now people want to think only what they are supposed to think, and this they consider freedom.’ – Oswald Spengler


39) ‘The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.’ – Samuel Adams. Natural Law.

40) ‘Post-totalitarianism arises when a system loses confidence in its own principles. It compensates not with overt tyranny but with coercive sentimentality: policing speech, narrowing debate and enforcing ritualised gestures of virtue in place of persuasion. It is a soft authoritarianism that no longer trusts its citizens and no longer quite trusts itself’ – Michael Rainsborough

A set from John Locke:


41) ‘Few men think, yet all will have opinions. Hence men’s opinions are superficial and confused.’ John Locke

42) ‘Men being, as has been said, by nature, all free, equal and independent, no one can be put out of this estate, and subjected to the political power of another, without his own consent.’
John Locke,

43) ‘New opinions are always suspected, and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are not common.’
John Locke

44) ‘Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth.’ – Albert Einstein

A brace from Belloc:


45) ‘It has been discovered that with a dull urban population, all formed under a mechanical system of State education, a suggestion or command, however senseless and unreasoned, will be obeyed if it be sufficiently repeated.’
– Hilaire Belloc, An Essay on the Restoration of Property

46) ‘In the Seventeenth Century a man feared to go to Mass lest the Judges should punish him. To-day a man fears to speak in favor of some social theory which he holds to be just and true lest his master should punish him.’ – Hilaire Belloc

And a brace from Alexander Hamilton:

47) ‘Those who stand for nothing fall for everything.’ – Alexander Hamilton

48) ‘Give all the power to the many, they will oppress the few. Give all the power to the few, they will oppress the many.’
Alexander Hamilton

49) ‘This is a declaration: We will not reform their system, we will destroy it. We will not beg for freedom, we will seize it. We will not wait for saviors, we will be our own salvation.
– Joseph Keel

50) ‘Most people do not really want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility, and most people are frightened of responsibility.’
Sigmund Freud


51) ‘Scepticism is the highest of duties; blind faith the unpardonable sin’ – Thomas Huxley

52) ‘If you want to change society, you don’t start with the men – you start with the women, because women influence everything downstream: the home, the children, the social expectations, and yes, even the behavior of men.’ – Source unknown

53) ‘People who value social conformity… support the government when it wants to increase its control over social behavior and punish nonconformity…valuing social conformity increases the motivation for placing restrictions on behavior.’ – Stanley Feldman

54) ‘A nation of people who just do what they are told by the ‘experts’ without question is a nation ripe for a descent into total tyranny’ – Ron Paul

55) ‘You will continue to suffer if you have an emotional reaction to everything that is said to you. True power is sitting back and observing things with logic. True power is restraint. If words
control you that means everyone else can control you. Breathe and allow things to pass.’ – Warren Buffett

56) ‘My principles are only those that, before the French Revolution, every well-born person considered sane and normal.’ – Julius Evola, when on trial after World War II.

57) ‘The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies
one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost
identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. The policies that are vital and necessary for America are no longer subjects of significant disagreement but are disputable only in details of procedure, priority, or method
Either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising and vigorless
Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other
party, which will be none of these things but will still persue, with new vigor
approximately the same basic policies’ – Carroll Quigley Tragedy And Hope (1966)

UK Inquiries Act 2005

The UK government commissions inquiries over incidents where trust has broken down and the public wants answers.

Since the enactment of the 2005 Inquiries Act, the notion of the UK “independent public inquiry” has become a nonsense. Let us review the particulars:

• The govt has sole responsibility for deciding whether an inquiry is held

• Under that Act the government sets the inquiry’s terms of reference. The govt decides what is in scope and out of scope.

• The government appoints the chair and, therefore, has control over appointments to the inquiry panel.

• The government can deny the submission of evidence.

• The government can restrict publication of evidence.

• The government can withhold witness testimony.

The government has the power to review and amend the “independent” Inquiry’s findings before they are published.

• The inquiry cannot determine criminal guilt.

• The inquiry has no ability to prosecute.

There is simply no such thing as an ‘independent public inquiry’ in the UK. The very term is what the Regime would call “disinformation”. They are government inquiries.

As such, any seemingly harsh “criticism” that comes out of a UK public inquiry is actually what the government wants you to believe. For example, the first module of the UK’s Covid19 inquiry concluded that lockdown should have started earlier, thereby supporting the concept that lockdown was the correct approach albeit not implemented quickly enough. This supports the government position. The government wanted this conclusion.

The legacy media, such as the state’s faithful Guardian newspaper, are then dispatched to sell this guff to the public.

Consider this as further conclusions of the Covid Inquiry are published. You will be told only what the government wants you to be told.

The Inquiries Act came into being because Tony Blair wanted to mimic the government control of outcomes that were possible in the US that led to whitewashes such as the Warren Commission (JFK) and the Kean Commission (9/11).

They’re Coming For Your Kids

Aristotle is credited with the line ‘Give me the boy until the age of 7 and I will show you the man.’

I hope you have noticed that governments are introducing ever more legislation that inserts the state between parents and their children.

If so then I hope you realise such laws are not originating from the state but from globalist bodies such as the UN. Such policies are then legitimised at national level via new legislation.

So, let’s start by investigating the UN’s actions in this regard.

The UNFPA is the United Nations Population Fund. The UNFPA is the sexual and reproductive health agency of the UN. It works to uphold the rights and choices of women, girls and young people across more than 150 countries.

Here’s what the UNFPA are pushing in the Philippines:

https://philippines.unfpa.org/en/news/unlocking-gender-equality-philippines

This article states:

‘Among the SDG targets that we still need to work on for the Philippines is ensuring universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights in accordance with the ICPD [International Conference on Population Development] Programme of Action. We are hopeful that the country will soon pass into law the “Adolescent Pregnancy Bill,” which guarantees access to reproductive health services for adolescents without parental consent under specific circumstances.’

Let’s start our critique of this paragraph with some clarification: ‘reproductive health’ and ‘reproductive rights’ are synonyms for ‘abortion’. Globalists promote abortion everywhere. Here we see that UNFPA is promoting abortions for teenagers. But, more than that, the UNFPA is looking to ensure that adolescent girls will be able to indulge in the act of abortion without the knowledge of their parents. This will be a secret between the girl and the state. The parents don’t need to know.

Yet before a girl can have an abortion, she needs to have sex. The UNFPA will also help here:

”It is important to realize that fulfilling sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) is crucial for us to achieve gender equality. SRHR prevents severe health consequences and other vulnerabilities that women face. But it’s not just about women’s health. It’s about dismantling the power structures that perpetuate gender inequality. With comprehensive sexuality education, young people will have the knowledge to protect their health, make informed decisions and challenge gender norms and stereotypes.’

So, we see Cultural Marxism revealed in all its glory via the promotion of the liberal agenda: encourage girls to fulfill their sexuality; inform them that sex is perfectly natural and can be performed  with anyone you want (safe in the knowldge that you can later get that secret abortion); there is no need to wait until marriage to have sex; the only way to achieve equality with men is to go out to work and engage in casual sex. And this is how we challenge gender norms.

Another UNFPA initiative is ‘Adolescent Peer Champions’ where they teach adolescents about the wonders of abortion and then send them out to spread the message to all of their friends and schoolmates. Obviously,  this is another blatant attempt to subvert parental control. Here’s a link to the article:

https://philippines.unfpa.org/en/news/building-bridges-bayer-unfpa-cpd-forum-tackle-adolescent-reproductive-health-challenges-world

And here’s an extract:

‘Building Adolescent Peer Champions for SRHR” initiative. This project aims to empower young people to become advocates for positive attitudes around sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). It involves training adolescent and adult social media influencers on SRHR communication, along with mentorship for content creation…’

Let’s get teenagers to promote abortions. What a great idea. It is obvious that the UNFPA plans to turn Philippino girls into facsimiles of Western women: promiscuous career women who use abortion as birth control. They aim to accelerate this process by subverting children’s relationship with their parents. 

I have presented a couple of UNFPA articles that focus on the Philippines but similar initiatives are underway in every country in which the UN operates.

Why does the UNFPA promote sex and abortion? Well, speculation is always a matter of guesswork but we can be sure that it is not because they want tennage girls to be happier and healthier. Triangulating statements from other Globalist organisations, we can surmise that the UN wants to significantly reduce the global population and promoting careers, casual sex and abortion is the way to do it. Look at how successful this strategy has been in the West.

I would also speculate that the UN wants to destroy the nuclear family as a way of reducing resistance to Globalist’ policies: again something that has been very effective in the West.

There are plenty of examples of intrusion into parent-child relationships at a national level, starting with Scotland.

The SNP (Scottish National Party), let’s remember, is the party that tried to appoint a Named Person, or state-registered guardian, for every single child. This ‘point of contact’ would have had ultimate responsibility for the child’s welfare – presumably because parents are thought incapable of supporting, advising and protecting their children without expert intervention:

https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/02/23/why-is-the-snp-so-obsessed-with-teenage-sex/

At the ‘Teacher of the Year’ ceremony held at the White House in 2022, President Joe Biden gave away what progressives truly believe:

“There’s no such thing as someone else’s child. No such thing as someone else’s child. Our nation’s children are all our children.”

He also said:

“They’re all our children. And the reason you’re the teachers of the year is because you recognize that. They’re not somebody else’s children. They’re like yours when they’re in the classroom,”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/biden-claims-school-children-don-234147454.html

In 2021 Quebec Bill 15 was introduced as part of an overhaul of the Youth Protection Act.    

The Bill removed the Parental Primacy law that names parents as the primary caregivers and decision makers for their children. In reference to Bill 15, Quebec Minister Carmant said:

“Science shows us that things have changed; one does not necessarily need a biological family: the child must be in a loving environment. That’s what’s really going to move our work forward this fall.”

https://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/societal-debates/item/quebec-calls-into-question-parental-primacy

Here’s a frightening story about a mum in Australia whose 6 year old son was seized and placed into foster care after she questioned her son’s leukaemia treatment:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12092001/Perth-mum-questioned-sons-leukaemia-treatment-taken-placed-foster-care.html

California always leads the way with any initiative that gives the state more power. Here are brief details of 3 Bills:

Bill AB1078 was approved as legislation in 2023:

Instead of heeding parent concerns, school administrators and teachers unions are stepping up their campaign to sideline parents. Nowhere is that more apparent than AB1078, a bill introduced by  Assemblyman Corey Jackson (D-Riverside) that would strip local school boards of their authority over the curriculum taught in their school district.     

AB 1078 would require school boards to receive approval from the state board of education before removing any instructional materials or books from classrooms and school libraries or “ceasing to teach any curriculum.    

”The bill is an attack on parents and school boards pushing back against the teacher unions’ drive to teach Critical Race Theory and inappropriate sexualized curricula in K-12 schools.”

Bill AB 665, was signed into legislation in 2023. Included in legislation ostensibly about extending mental health care to lower-income California youths, is a provision that effectively would terminate parents’ rights over their kids as soon as they turn 12.     

The California Family Council warns that this bill

“would allow children as young as 12 years old to consent to being placed into state funded group homes without parental permission or knowledge.”     

As long as a mental health professional signs off on it, the kids can go to such a group home—and it doesn’t matter what their parents think.  

  https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/04/07/california-bill-would-let-12-year-olds-leave-home-without-parents-ok/

Bill AB957 dating from 2023 was ultimately not passed into legislation:   

Under AB957, parents who refuse to participate in transgenderism by pretending that their child is a different gender could be guilty of failing to provide for the “health, safety, and welfare” of their child—therefore losing custody to another parent or the state.        “Gender affirmation” isn’t defined or explained in AB 957 or any other California law, drawing concerns over interpretation.     Susannah Luthi, who covers California for The Washington Free Beacon, pointed out:

“The bill makes no distinctions regarding the age of a child, how long a child has identified as transgender, or affirmation of social transition versus medical sex-change treatments.”

Here’s an article about the
Oregon Department of Education advising schools to keep students’ ‘Gender Identity’ hidden from families:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/oregon-advises-schools-to-keep-students-gender-identity-hidden-from-families_4969789.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge&src_src=partner&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

The regime is on your side, kids.

Here’s details of a  Bill in Virginia that charges parents for not supporting their child’s ‘Gender Identity’:

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/10/virginia-democrat-announces-bill-that-charges-parents-for-not-supporting-childs-gender-identity/ref/8/

Here’s an example from the UK:

‘FOI responses collected by Policy Exchange showed that 72 per cent of secondary schools are now teaching that people have a gender identity that may be different from their biological sex…’    

‘Nearly half of secondary schools are allowing children to self-declare their gender without parental consent, an investigation has found…’

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/30/secondary-schools-allow-children-self-declare-gender/   

And let’s not forget the UK ‘Child and Families Act (2014) that places the welfare of the child above all other considerations. All other orders rescinded. Parents expendable.

During the 2021 campaign for Virginia governor, the Democrat candidate Terry McAuliffe stated parents have no control over what their kids learn in school. In a debate against the Repubcilcan challenger, Glenn Youngkin, McAuliffe told us how he really felt:    

“I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.”

https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/10/terry-mcauliffes-war-on-parents/

What motivations are behind such legislation? Its definitely about reducing the global population but it’s also about control. Liberal democracies are becoming increasingly indistinguishable from authoritarian states and authoritarian states impose very tight controls on their citizenry. Citizens must perform the loyalty tests the state would have them perform. There is no room for dissent in such regimes. The state knows that instilling the mantras of Liberal societies in children is the best way of farming a compliant population. It’s indoctrination. Nothing outside the state.

Postscript:

The following, related,  thought occurred to me a couple of weeks after posting this article:

The entire Leftist philosophy is built upon the premise of the ‘blank slate’, ie that all humans are the same and that it is only nuture that makes us different. It follows from this that Leftists all differences – ie ‘inequalities – between us can be expunged if the govt becomes responsible for our upbringing. Hence, the increasing role governments are taking in parenting.

Post-script: the day after posting this piece, I read this article:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/christian-parents-lose-final-appeal-after-swedish-state-took-daughters-following-false-abuse-claim

For Those That Haven’t Figured It Out Yet

1) Smart meters are the means by which your access to energy will be limited during the coming energy transition when there won’t be enough energy for everyone.

2) The WEF, Bilderberg Group, The UN, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and all other elitist forums meet for the purpose of furthering their interests, not yours.

3) The price of gold is at record highs because there is a growing feeling that there is going to be an economic collapse during which stocks, shares and deposits will be seized in line with recent ‘bail-in’ legislation.

4) Ditto for cryptocurrencies.

5) No one ever gets into trouble for lying at the behest of the Establishment.

6) The perpetual demonisation of Russia by Western politicians and media reflects the West’s desire to wage war on Russia, not Russia’s desire to wage war on the West.

7) Fascism is a left wing ideology built around central planning. Hitler and Mussolini were both socialists.

8) Digital IDs are the foundation stone of the intended social credit system in the West.

9) Every piece of legislation the govt introduces to protect our safety, removes aspects of our freedom.

10) ‘Sustainability’ is a synonym for ‘restrictions’.

11) Anthropogenic Climate Change is just money, power and politics.

12) You should never use any type of plastic in the microwave

13) The c19 response was nothing to do with health.

14) Internet censorship laws are not about protecting children. They are the means by which the govt seeks to control the online narrative.

15) The main purpose of regulations is to push SMEs out of business by introducing burdens that large corporations are better able to absorb. When the SMEs are gone the big companies then lobby to reduce the regulations.

16) Ditto the main purpose of ‘Employment Rights’.

17) The UK govt has more unchecked power than any British monarch ever had.

18) There are a number of Global Stakeholders, each of whom has more influence on UK government policy than all of the British electorate combined.

19) ULEZ’s; LTN’s; 15 minute cities etc are not about improving air quality or traffic flow. They are about setting up the surveillance infrastructure for ‘Smart Cities’ and reducing freedom of movement.

20) Global bodies such as the UN (Inc WHO, IPCC) are exaggerating / inventing ‘global threats’ in order to accrue more powers to oversee ‘global solutions.

21) Billionaires don’t set up Foundations because they want to be philanthropists. They do it so they can wield political influence without participating in the vulgarity of winning elections.

22) Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) on UK homes will be used to squeeze private landlords into selling their rental properties to Corporate landlords.

23) People are not all the same.

24) Progressivism is a trojan horse for Communism.

25) The reasons the people are given for going to war (security, democracy, freedom, WMD’s etc.) are never the real reasons (resources, regional primacy, strengthen domestic political position,  geo-political strategy etc.).

26) If something is being presented as a ‘global crisis’ for which only global solutions are possible, then it is a scam

27) Most Western govts are engaged in a war on farming because farmers are de-centralised and independent. Centralised farming is the objective.

28) Western countries are no longer democracies representing the wishes of their electorates but oligarchies representing the wishes of Stakeholder Capitalists.

29) ‘Surveillance capitalism’ is the reason Tech companies are setting up billion dollar data processing centres to run the apps that you use for free.

30) Corporatism in the 2020s allows the govt to outsource functions of the authoritarian state – such as de-banking and censorship – to private companies yet stand behind the excuse that private companies can do what they want.

31) During Covid19 the govt told you that compliance was the best way to end the covid restrictions whereas, in fact, covid restrictions ended because of increasing non-compliance. If we were totally compliant, we would have covid restrictions to this day.

32) Liberal Democracy is collapsing. It will be at its most dangerous as it struggles to survive.

Not yet published on LI:

33) Billion dollar data centres are being built to manage the coming surveillance state – CDBCs, Digital IDs, facial recognition, social credit system, geo-fencing etc

34) 1930s-style ‘corporatism’ was comprised of Public Private Partnerships where the corporations were subordinate to the govts. 2020s-style corporatism is comprised of Public Private Partnerships where the governments are subordinate to the corporations.

35) A new socio-economic system is being built around us: technocracy.

36) Socio-economic systems cannot be designed, they have to evolve. Designed systems always fail.


37) The Establishment is instigating the conditions for societal collapse in order to create the opportunities under which it can implement a new socio-economic system.

38) Public private partnerships are the definition of ‘fascism’.

39) The bulk of practical politics in 2026 is devoted to social engineering in order to make the populace accepting or even clamouring for the policies that the government have already decided to roll-out.

40) The vaccine passports that many Western countries tried to implement in 2020, were just an under-hand attempt at introducing a digital ID

41) ESG is a social credit system for companies to ensure that all large companies are brought into alignment in advance of The Great Reset and that most SMEs will collapse.

42) Things will make more sense if you assume the government is lying at all times.

43) Most Regulators have been captured by the industries they are supposed to be regulating.

44) The govt achieves compliance by promoting their objectives as moral choices

45) Globalists are seeking global governance.

46) The dictum of practical politics in the 21st century is not to represent public opinion, nor even to appeal to public opinion but to control it.

47) Global stakeholders have decided that public consent is optional. Consent can be fabricated when necessary.

48) Social media platforms are surveillance and censorship engines for the government.

49) We don’t learn the lessons of history. We learn the lessons of history that suit the purposes of the ruling class.

50) Paying people not to work during the covid lockdowns was a mass-scale UBI experiment.

51) Govts regularly follow the steps of ‘problem, reaction, solution’ to achieve their objectives. The govt creates or encourages a ‘problem’ which causes a ‘reaction’ of fear or anger in the people. The govt then steps forward with  a ‘solution’ where that solution was the objective all along.

52) When politicians and journalists refer to the ‘far right’, they mean white people.

53) Western countries are falling into chaos because their govts are following global policies rather than national policies.

54) 19th and early 20th century eugenics theory and practise never went away. It was just re-branded as ‘environmentalism’ and ‘health’ policies.

55) The new cold war is over resources, not political ideology

56) Cultures are not all the same.

57) Global stakeholders promote transgenderism because it allows them to introduce policies that, superficially, are about supporting vulnerable teens but are really about subverting parental control of their children.

58) Global stakeholders also promote transgenderism because it plants the seed that anyone can be anyone which is a forerunner of their plans to roll-out transhumanism whereby anyone can be anything.

59) All Global Stakeholders want the global population to be a fraction of current levels. Bear that in mind when you next hear the UN make references to ‘Reproductive Health’

60) Government regulations are written with the input of the Major Players from the industry being regulated. Therefore, the major players push for regulations that will give them a competitive advantage over their smaller rivals.

61) Quantitative easing is a process for transferring money from the poor (inflation) to the rich (inflated asset prices).

62) Global Stakeholders are setting policies based on the beliefs that all people are the same and that Western nations are still high trust societies.

63) If there were no conspiracies then there would be no whistleblowers yet we have Assange and Snowden among hundreds of others (Mordechai Vanunu, Herve Falciani; Dr David Kelly; Professor Francis Boyle; Virginia Giuffre)

64) Monitoring “hate” is one of the hallmarks of a totalitarian regime.

65) The assent of government always leads to the destruction of religion as the government demands no competitor vying for the minds of men.

65) Since WW2, all Western governments have been embarked on an agenda to undermine every aspect of communitality – the family, religion, communities.

66) The censorship of dissent is a leading indicator that the Goverment is running a propaganda campaign to promote a latent agenda.

67) Keir Starmer is a member of the Trilateral Commission which means he is dedicated to the implementation of Technocracy under Global Governance. Hence, why he always references ‘International Law’.

68) Wokeness is a manifestation of women’s collective mindset that emerged approximately 10 years ago as a consequence of women reaching a critical mass in academia, media and politics.

69) Corporations don’t have ‘values’, they have speech codes.

70) Corporations will adopt any ‘corporate value’ that will help the govt and the media leave them alone.

71) There are no rich, low energy countries

72) A country that can make little can do little

72) The state has a monopoly on the use of violence.

73) The State is the monopoly of all monopolies
(Singular control of currency, banking, media, education, health, pensions, justice, use of violence, laws, roads, infrastructure projects, natural resources, civil registry, police, armed forces, basic services, labour negotiation)

74) The British institutions of government protect their own authority at the expense of honest inquiry and make it career suicide for anyone inside them to say so.

75) The very feedback the institution needs to function is the feedback that it suppresses.

76) The British institutions of government protect their own authority at the expense of honest inquiry and suppress the very feedback that they need to properly function.

77) Social media bans on children are not about protecting children, they are about controlling adults

78) The responsibility of govt used to be about protecting our freedoms while we were responsible for our own safety. Now government has taken over responsibility for keeping us safe and tramples over our freedoms to do so.

79) We are told that Russia and China are our enemies. No, they’re not. Our enemies live among us.

It’s Hard To Disagree With Jeffrey Sachs

Jeffrey Sachs (born November 5, 1954) is an American economist and public policy analyst. He is a professor at Columbia University and is director of the Center for Sustainable Development at the university.

A number of Sachs’ political assessments have struck a chord with me over the last 5 years, such as he delivered during his interview with Tucker Carlson last year (2025).

However, I felt this one was worth transcribing and posting on ny blog, for both future reference and the benefit of any readers of this blog who may not be familiar with Sachs. I do not know the context of what prompted these comments, nor where they were delivered. Two links that show these words being spoken live by Sachs are attached below.

Here we go:

‘The 10 richest Americans have $2.3tn of wealth. That’s a lot for 10 individuals. That’s not 10 companies. That’s not 10 clans. That’s 10 people. But they also happen to own a lot more.

They own the White House.

They installed the Vice President.

They determine US govt policy.

They will own the cryptocurrencies which will become our main currencies.

They own all of the big platforms on which we communicate.

They own YouTube, of course, which is the channel where I’m able to say, sometimes, things that are not to the US government’s liking but I don’t know for how long.

They own my email address.

They own the full knowledge of every keystroke I’ve made in the last 10 years, no doubt.

They own my privacy.

They own the newspapers like the Washington Post, owned by Jeff Bezos.

They will own TikTok, shortly because Larry Ellison is buying it on behalf of of Benjamin Netenyahu and Ellison will give it to his son as a nice gift. He’s already given to his son Paramount Studios, Paramount Nedia and CBS News.

It’s quite a world and that’s just 10 or so Americans. So were in a very strange concentration of power, I think the likes of which we’ve never seen before. It has already destroyed democracy. We are democratic in form only but we don’t have a sensible non-democratic system. We have a privatised system which is quite different.

In China, which is not a democracy, it is a technocracy, and the business sector is subordinate to the government, clearly as Jack Ma found out. In the US, it is the other way around which is that the government is subordinate to the particular class of the Big Tech sector. So, we’re in a governance adventure as well. The difference of the utopian and dystopian vision of AI is politics. Whether there will be general well-being will depend on how we use surplus. If all the surplus goes to the top then we will have mass-impoverishment.’

Reading this makes me think of the WEF declaring that by 2030 we will own nothing.
And it makes me think how all assets are now taxed so the little people can’t make money. And I think how the rich tie their money up in trusts and other protective instruments so that they don’t pay inheritance tax.
I think how energy is becoming ever more unaffordable.
I think how SMEs are being squeezed by business rates, energy prices and regulation
I think how all legislation is increasingly authoritarian. And I think how Global Stakeholders are planning to tokenise all natural assets so that normal people can no longer enjoy them.

We can’t go on like this. Can we?

Here are the links:

LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ugcPost-7429182520014897152-uJwS

YouTube:

https://youtu.be/4Ub1MApLNbo?si=crDG-BEhc6xl2lNr

The sound is a bit iffy in places on the YT link.

The Libertarian Alliance

For Life, Liberty and Property

Tallbloke's Talkshop

Cutting edge science you can dice with

Watts Up With That?

The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change

True Masculine Value

Being a man of value in a world increasingly hostile to authentic masculinity: Redpill, Marriage, Fatherhood, Counter-Feminism.

Atticus Fox

PJ O'Rourke meets Bill Hicks

Discover WordPress

A daily selection of the best content published on WordPress, collected for you by humans who love to read.

The Atavist Magazine

PJ O'Rourke meets Bill Hicks

Longreads

Longreads : The best longform stories on the web

WordPress.com Blog

News, Tips & Website Tutorials

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started